An
article published in British Medical Science publication
stated 6 years ago that studies have proven that eating
fruits as a source for vitamins is by far better than
taking vitamin pills. The report was based on scientific
evidence that fruits
contain,
besides
their main vitamin chains,
like Vitamin C, A, B and others, hundreds of minerals
and vitamin-alike substances which themselves again
interact with each other, giving the fruit an advantage
which is light years ahead of a simple vitamin pill
which has no inter-action at all, and is lacking of
those hundreds of substances.
Needless to say: same article stated also that nobody
might ever be able to analyze how those hundreds of
elements within a single piece of fruit interact with
one another. Thus nobody will ever be able to determine
what it really is, what makes the fruit that much
better than the vitamin pill. But all scientists agreed:
Eating fresh fruits is by far better than consuming
vitamin pills.
What a scientific finding! Do we really need a scientist to tell this? Or is this what we should call "Common Sense"?
Our
grandparents told us already when we were kids: "eat
lots of fruit
and vegetables. That is best for your health".
Did our trust in progress and modern scientific research
make us blind for simple natural remedies?
Yes
it did. For most of us.
Another
Example of Scientific Findings:
Recently,
in November 2004 scientists ended a test that lasted
over 15 years. The test measured the mortality rate
of the persons who participated in it.
It was about to proof that an intake of
high dosage vitamin C per day
will extend human life span. One
group of test persons got a daily dosage of ascorbic
acid. Another group of persons got a lower daily dosage
of ascorbic acid and a third group got a placebo (a
pill that contains nothing at all).
For those who are not familiar with the term "ascorbic
acid", it is Vitamin C, produced as a chemical
substance (Not the natural vitamin C which we find
in an orange or lemon, but the chemical product!).
Test
results:
The results of this long-term test were shocking for
the whole scientific community. While expectations
were high, that a high intake of ascorbic acid over
the years will lead to a longer life, the opposite
occurred in many events. Especially those people who
were suffering from diabetes or diabetes-like symptoms:
they died significantly earlier when taking a high
dosage of ascorbic acid on a daily basis.
Scientists concluded: there seems to be an unknown
mechanism, a problem for people with diabetics and
a high intake of ascorbic acid.
Final
results: all scientists however agreed, even though
the results of this test were unexpected, they cannot
assume that same will happen
with the intake of natural vitamin C (fruit, vegetables)
and recommended to eat fruits and vegetables as your
source of vitamins, instead of ascorbic acid - even
if you suffer from diabetes.
Well,
nicely said. Good findings here again. Do we really
need a test of such a long period of time to find
out what we should know already?
In
other words: Do you have the time to wait for those
trivial outcomes when it comes to a test for a cancer
remedy?
Certainly
not.
Time is running and YOU are the one to be affected.
YOU have cancer, not the others.
Can you wait another 10 years until scientists find
out that natural plants might be the best cure for
cancer? Or simply does it make sense to boost your
immune system when your body is weakened from a battle
with cancer?
Certainly it does!
It
is your life and your life happens now!
There
are people and websites that neglect all herbal remedies
for
cancer with just one sentence:
"There
seems to be no scientific evidence...that this herbal
medicine
can help. There are plenty of testimonials but no
scientific evidence".
But
the truth is:
It is easy to give an advice like this, especially
when you are not affected.
There is no doubt that the immune system of cancer
patients can be improved by a tenfold due to a herbal
cocktail.
That
is good. Isn't it?
But
some scientists would argue: this is not a scientific
proof. You have to make tests over a long period of
time with different groups of persons, some take your
herbals, others don't and a third party use placebo.
Then you have to see the morality rate...the test
persons have to be randomly chosen from various regions
to eliminate other factors like environment and so
on.
That
is all fine and true. Indeed that is the correct way
to carry out scientific tests.
But
then again? Can you wait? Do you have this time? Or
is it in some
instances better to say: "if this product is
100% herbal and it is said
to help, what do I have to lose?
If this product has no side-effects because it is
100% herbal and I can go along with it together with
all my other therapies, like chemotherapy, what do
I have to lose?
Only
because some scientists say that this product has
not been scientifically proven to help with cancer
would that be enough reason not to try it?
It is your life. You decide. Most of our members were
sceptical too in the beginning.
They
did not know about any herbal medicines, especially
not about Tian Xian. Today some of our contributing
members take Tian Xian already for 6 months and longer
and they have achieved very promising reults.
-do
what the doctors tell you
-on top of that, turn your entire life into a Natural
Approach.
-use your common sense.
